The Bloomberg wire service and Reuters report that the firm will scrap its deal with Russia’s Rosatom to develop the state-owned firm's VVER pressurized water reactor (PWR) to compete with exports from Areva.
Siemens said the firm felt that after Fukushima demand for reactor exports would diminish casting doubt on the financial viability of the deal. Neither wire service included any statements from Rosatom about the decision by Siemens to end the partnership. No reactors were ever jointly built by the two firms. Rosatom has several active nuclear export contracts including new reactors being built in Turkey, India, China, and Vietnam.
Siemens exited from its nuclear reactor joint venture with Areva in 2010 after paying a financial penalty of [e]648 million ($894 million). That firm is building new reactors in Finland and France. Also, it is bidding on new work (see below). According to the Financial Times (London) under the terms of the financial settlement, Siemens has a non-compete clause with Areva that doesn't expire until 2013.
Closed chapter
According to the interview, he called the move “an answer” to Germany’s decision to close eight of its 17 reactors now and all of them in the next ten years.
That move has been widely hailed by green groups in Germany and by Social Democrats intent on bringing down the precarious conservative government of Chancellor Angela Merkel. At one time Merkel embraced nuclear energy helping her win the national elections in September 2010. However, the Fukushima crisis caused her panic due to political fallout in regional elections and to reverse course on keeping the reactors open past 2022.
Her decision to close reactors has been greeted with skepticism by the rest of Europe which depends on the nation’s economic stability to keep the Euro common currency afloat.
Loescher disagrees that there will be energy shortfalls and said he feels that Germany’s plan to derive 35% of its energy from wind and solar by 2020 is achievable. When all 17 nuclear reactors were operational, they provided about 28% of Germany’s electricity according to the World Nuclear organization. Two-thirds come from coal and natural gas.
In the near-term Germany is expected to increase its imports of natural gas from Russia. In the longer-term, the planned construction of up to five new nuclear reactors at the CEZ utility's site at Temelin in the Czech Republic may ease the prospect of energy shortages. Areva, Rosatom, and Westinghouse are bidders for the project which could be worth up to $25 billion.
According to Bloomberg, a Siemens spokesman said the firm would continue to manufacture steam turbines for fossil fuel and nuclear powered electricity generation projects in Germany and for export.
Areva pushes for Middle East contracts
While Siemens is retreating from the nuclear business, its former partner Areva is pushing ahead to ink new deals. The latest move involves a joint venture with Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to bid on Turkey’s second nuclear power station to be built at Sinop on the Black Sea coast. This moves follows the withdrawal of a consortium of Toshiba and TEPCO following the Fukushima nuclear crisis.
Last year Areva shareholders added [e]900 in working capital ($1.24 billion). Tsukuda added that Mitsubishi would step up to offer capital to Areva if needed in the future.
The joint venture is referencing the 1,100 MW Atmea nuclear reactor for the bid in Turkey and also for a similar project in Jordan.
# # #
4 comments:
The German government has reacted in a knee-jerk manner to the Fukushima nuclear crisis stemming from a large earthquake and tsunami. Nuclear energy has saved tens of thousands of lives in Japan and Germany and Japan by avoiding the air pollution related deaths that would have resulted from nuclear power alternatives like coal. By quickly choosing to again "yield to the mob" mentality of the Greens' distortions of fact, Germany has chosen to give up the contribution of its current nuclear power plants supplying 28% of its current production, and put its future in reality to more and more electricity from running coal plants, with public health impacts far exceeding nuclear energy, and gas and electric imports from outside Germany much to its economic and strategic detriment. Germany is giving up the current and future climactic, environmental, strategic, and economic benefits of nuclear energy to placate the Greens who are ultimately pursuing a goal of societal changes having nothing to do with energy alternatives.
I wonder how "near term" the reliance on Russian natgas will be. Watch for a rate increase and threats to turn off the gas if Germany objects.
Germany may attain its wish for 35% if its electricity coming from diffuse and intermittent renewables, but only if it considerably increases the amount of fossil-fuel powered backup to provide base-load.
Unbelievable. An entire nation's scared stiff and drops a reliable clean small-footprint energy source because ANOTHER country has a rare natural catastrophe that cripples its nuclear plants with zero deaths and no public property damage! It's kind of like looking a gift horse in the mouth! Someone ought cue Germany and Japan up on the latest fatalities caused by oil and gas production! They're roasting marshmellows on the gasline breaks popping around the U.S. lately!
Too bad half of the New York subway system is built with Siemens equipment!
James Greenidge
I expect the Czech's to step right in with their new build to fill the void, probably just in time for the German's to realize their mistake but by then the jobs and the independence will have evaporated.
Post a Comment